A couple of days ago I woke up, opened the Facebook group, and found pure panic. People had gone to their earnings page and noticed the Creator Connections tab looked different — and some of them thought Amazon was taking the whole thing away. I want to walk you through what actually changed, why I wasn’t worried about it, and the one thing about this change that I do think matters.

Table of Contents

Why I Wasn’t Worried When Everyone Else Was

I’ll be honest — I had about 1% concern about this. I didn’t even really dig into it at first.

Here’s why. When you’ve been in these programs for a while, one thing holds up as fundamentally true: if Amazon is going to make a major change to how you earn, they tell you ahead of time. Earning changes get announced. That’s not something that quietly shows up one morning while you’re pouring coffee.

We saw that pattern hold through all the changes that rolled out at the end of last year and into March and April. So when the Creator Connections tab looked different with no announcement attached, my read was that this was a reporting change, not an earnings change.

I still understand the panic. You look at your page, the most important part of the program appears to be missing, and your first thought is “where’d it go?” That’s fair.

Amazon didn’t say anything until the first day of the rollout, and I suspect that only happened because people started writing in. About halfway through the day they finally put out a note saying they were rolling something out starting that day through the next. It read like a reporting change.

What Actually Changed in Your Reports

I was half right and half wrong about what was coming.

Here’s the context. Creator Connections has always had its own earnings reporting, separate from the regular side. If you pull the last 30 days inside Creator Connections and compare it against the regular earnings page, the numbers don’t quite line up. Not by a lot — just enough to be odd.

So I assumed Amazon was going to create consistency between the two. I was right about the consistency. I was wrong about which direction they’d take it.

What they did was make Creator Connections reporting look identical to the regular Amazon side. And remember what happened to the regular side in March and April: you can now only see a product if it sold four units or more. Under four units, it doesn’t appear on your report.

That same visibility threshold has now been applied to Creator Connections. That’s the change.

Why You’re Seeing Blank Lines

This is the part tripping up the most people, so let me be specific.

In Creator Connections, when you select a date range, a product shows up on your report if it either sold at least four units in that window or got at least 10 clicks in that window.

So those blank lines you’re staring at are products that cleared the 10 click threshold but didn’t clear the four unit threshold. The product qualified to appear. The sales number didn’t qualify to display.

Which means — and this is important — you may well have made sales on those products. If something got 10-plus clicks, there’s a high likelihood it converted at least once. You’re just not being shown the number.

You still got the credit. You still got the earnings. You just can’t see the line item anymore.

Why This One Actually Matters

Here’s the piece I want you to sit with, and it’s not really about the reporting itself.

When Amazon rolled this system out in March and April, people were furious. They wrote in. They filed tickets. The prevailing hope was that if enough of us complained, Amazon would reverse it.

At the time I said I didn’t think that would happen — they’d already rolled it out in Australia, and this was clearly a global change. And Amazon absolutely knew people hated it. An Amazon rep I know personally told me they were getting slammed during that stretch by people who couldn’t stand the change. But there was never any indication they planned to reverse it.

This latest move is a double down. They took that system, looked at the reaction, and expanded it into Creator Connections anyway.

To me that’s a massive signal: this is the system going forward. Complaining isn’t going to move it. Plan accordingly.

Does It Affect What You Earn?

No. And I don’t see a real strategic impact either.

Think about how you actually make decisions. You almost certainly weren’t building strategy off a product that sold once or twice. Nobody looks at a single unit and restructures their content calendar around it. It’s when something starts selling in volume that you lean in — and volume is still perfectly visible.

What you lose is the ones and twos. And I’ll be straight with you: those were genuinely valuable for motivation, especially when you’re new and you need proof the thing is working. I liked seeing them too. That loss is real, it’s just an emotional loss rather than a strategic one.

The follow-up question I always get is: how do I know I’m getting paid what I earned? And look — there’s always been a small gray area in this program around attribution. People have questioned it for years. But those of us who’ve been in it a long time generally don’t spend energy there, because Amazon’s attribution is broadly right even when a report looks weird. I’ve been doing this three years. I trust it. They’ll get something wrong here and there, but the system holds up.

Why Amazon Is Doing This

Here’s my theory, and I think it’s pretty well supported by the pattern.

You and I are not the demographic Amazon optimizes for. These changes started rolling out around the middle to end of last year, and it was obvious even then that they were being built on behalf of large publishers.

By large publishers I mean the New York Times, TechCrunch, CNET — outlets pushing affiliate links at a scale where they’re moving thousands of units a month. Those companies do not care about the ones and twos and threes. That granularity is useless to them. And since Amazon makes enormous money from that tier, the reporting systems got shaped around their needs.

There’s also a boring infrastructure angle. Serving line-item reports for every single one-unit and two-unit sale across Amazon’s entire creator ecosystem is a lot of server load for data that most large accounts throw away.

None of that makes it less frustrating for us. We’re small compared to the New York Times, and this genuinely does limit our visibility. But it explains why it’s happening and why it isn’t getting reversed.

What This Means If You Use Oink

A couple of Oink features pull from those reports, so I want to be upfront about what’s affected.

A few weeks ago I rolled out a trend system for Creator Connections that surfaces your top trending products. It was built on the full report we had access to at the time. You don’t really have a full report anymore — so if you’re not selling much volume, that section may come up thin or empty.

I ran it on my own account yesterday. I’ve got a lot of videos and I’ve been around a while, and one section only returned a single product because the data underneath it just isn’t there anymore.

That said — nothing fundamental about how you use Oink changes. The trend view was a nice-to-have for spotting what was working and what was flopping. Your product research, your storefront tools, and your ability to earn are all untouched.

Here’s the full walkthrough if you want to see the reports on screen:

Amazon is going to keep changing things without telling you first. Oink is how I keep my own workflow organized through all of it — Storefront Cross Check, Comparison Video Schedule, and Unavailable Video Matching. Check it out at oinkforinfluencers.com.

Let me know in the comments what your reports are showing you.

Similar Posts